So which is better, HD 530 or HD 5200? At this point it will already create a miasma of uncertainty, probably exaggerated until we get a definite explanation of the stack nomenclature. While you could argue that 5 is more than 4, but we already have HD 5200, HD 5500, Iris 6100 and others. ![]() Personally we find that it adds more confusion, because the HD 4600 naming is not directly linked to the HD 530 naming. HD4600) to a three digit (HD 530) arrangement in order "to minimize confusion" (direct quote). We have been told directly by Intel that they have changed their graphics naming scheme from a four digit (e.g. We can confirm that this is a 24 EU design, and this most likely follows on from Intel’s 8 th Generation graphics in the sense that we have a base GT2 design featuring three sub-slices of 8 EUs each.Īs far as we can tell, Intel calls the HD 530 graphics part of its 9 th Generation (i.e. This is different than what GPU-Z indicates, which points to a 48 EU design instead, although GPU-Z is not often correct on newer graphics modules before launch day. Querying HD 530 via Intel's OpenCL driver reports a 24 EU design running at 1150 MHz. Not coming up with many details, we did the obvious thing – check what information comes directly out of the processor. ![]() ![]() When I first heard the name, alarm bells went off in my head with questions: why is the name different, has the architecture changed, and what does this mean fundamentally? Both the Skylake processors here use Intel’s HD 530 graphics solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |